Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13745 (ALL)

SEEMA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/3494/2025 · 2025-02-19

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25166 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3494 of 2025 Applicant :- Seema Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Narayan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Heard Sri Raj Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ghanshyam, learned brief holder for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.84 of 2024, under Sections 392, 420, 342, 323, 504, 506, 411 IPC, Police Station Manikpur, District Chitrakoot, during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the basis of false allegation, applicant has been made accused in the present matter along with co-accused Raj Narayan and Ram Sajeevan and both the above co-accused have already been released on bail by this Court and their bail orders have been annexed along with instant bail application and case of applicant is even on better footing than them. 4. He further submits that applicant is not having any previous criminal history and all the alleged offeces are triable by Magistrate-I Class and in the present matter, applicant is in jail since 04.11.2024. 5. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 7. Considering arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and the fact that two co-accused Raj Narayan and Ram Sajeevan have already been released on bail by this Court and and case of applicant is even on better footing than them and applicant is not having any previous criminal history and in the present matter, applicant is in jail since 04.11.2024, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant - Seema be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless her personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 10. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 11. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 20.2.2025 S.A. Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad