S. Giridhar Kumar v. The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corportion
WP/4368/2011 · 2025-07-10
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13743 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13743 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010166702011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 4368/2011 Between:
1. S. GIRIDHAR KUMAR, S/O. LATE S. KRISHNA MURTHY DEPOT MANAGER A.P.S.R.T.C., ANAKAPALLI DEPOT, ANAKAPALLI. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORTION, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SELECTION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD, APSRTC. BUS BHAVAN, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 3. THE VICE CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR, APSRTC BUS BHAVAN, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the show cause Notice No. Ea/255(10)/2010-PD dated 01-02-2011 proposing to revert the petitioner from the post of Asst. Mechanical Engineer to the Post of Asst. Engineer Mechanical is arbitrary, unjust, contrary to A.P.S.R.T.C. Employees' (Recruitment) Regulations, 1966, discriminatory and in violation of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same together with Minute No: 10/2011 dated 18-01-2011 deleting the petitioner's name from approved panel and direct the Respondents to continue the petitioner as Asst. Mechanical Engineer. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 5404 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an interim suspension of the show cause notice of reversion No.Ea/255(10)/2010-PD dated 01-02-2011, pending disposal of the writ petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WVMP 1720 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the ex-parte interim orders passed in WPMP No. 5404 of 2011 in WP No. 4368 of 2011 with exemplary costs and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2012(WVMP 69786 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A G SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC)
2. --
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 4368 of 2011 ORDER:
Sri A.G.Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner representing by virtual mode, stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has rendered infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infrucutuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 11.07.2025 SPP
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Writ Petition No:4368 of 2011
Date : 11.07.2025
SPP