Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13741 (RAJ)

RAM SINGH YADAV S/O BHAGWAN SAHAY YADAV v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/4620/2025 · 2025-04-02

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14730] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4620/2025 Ram Singh Yadav S/o Bhagwan Sahay Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Raghunath Pura, Sanpo Ki Dhani, Tehsil Jalsu, District Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health And Family Welfare, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, State Institute Of Medical Health And Family Welfare, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Sharma for Mr. Ashok Bansal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 02/04/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of by giving directions to the respondents to decide the representation dated 09.12.2024 filed by the petitioner in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024). 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent No. 2 to consider the abovesaid representation of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of 15 days from the date of passing of this order, strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular issued by the Chief [2025:RJ-JP:14730] (2 of 2) [CW-4620/2025] Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). Learned counsel for the petitioner is at liberty to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent No. 2, in case of non-compliance of the aforementioned directions. 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with abovesaid directions. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /125