Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137394 (ALL)

MAHARAJ SINGH v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, UNNAO AND OTHERS

WRIB/389/2025 · 2025-04-30

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24671 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 389 of 2025 Petitioner :- Maharaj Singh Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Unnao And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anjani Kumar Dvivedi,O.P. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State Counsel and perused the records. The present application has been filed for the following main relief:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the impugned order's dated 08-01-2025 passed by the learned Deputy Director of Consolidation Unnao passed in revision no. 450/2024, ( In order sheet mentioned as case no. 0016/2024, computer case no. 202454106900000016) Maharaj Singh versus Sarkaar and others, u/s 48(1) of U.P. Consolidation and holding Act as well as impugned orders dated 25-08-2021 as well as 07-12-2023 passed by the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Consolidation officer Ganj Muradabad, Bangarmau Unnao passed in the case no. 100/23, computer case no. 202154106940060018 State versus Maharaj Singh and others , u/s 9 A(2) of U.P. Ch act (contained as Annexure no. 1,2 and 3 of writ petition) passed by the opposite parties no. 1 and 2." After taking note of the facts of the case including that Sarju Devi mother of the petitioner executed a sale deed dated 13.03.2004 in favour of her daughter-in-law namely Smt. Ranjana Devi alias Vijay Lakshmi w/o Ram Prakash Singh, by which she transferred her total share of the land in issue i.e. 1/2 and this sale deed has not been cancelled till date as also the amendments sought in the application preferred by the private opposite parties, which was taken on record on 25.08.2021 as evident from the copy of the application annexed at page 48 of the paper book, and the proposition settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Life Insurance Corporation of India Versus Sanjeev Builders Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1128, on being confronted, learned Counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the present petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench