223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA MUNIA DEVI AND ORS. SURESH KUMAR AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- VIKRAM AGGARWAL 1. respondent No.1 has been received back with the report that he has expired. 2. served or otherwise. 3. appearance on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are no longer 01.12.2025 himanshu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2084-2010 Date of Decision: MUNIA DEVI AND ORS. Versus SURESH KUMAR AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL None for the appellants. None for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) As per the report of the Registry, notice issued to respondent No.1 has been received back with the report that he has Notice issued to respondent No.2 was not received back served or otherwise. On the last date of hearing also, nobody h appearance on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2010 Date of Decision: 01.12.2025 …Appellants …Respondents VIKRAM AGGARWAL Insurance Company. As per the report of the Registry, notice issued to respondent No.1 has been received back with the report that he has otice issued to respondent No.2 was not received back On the last date of hearing also, nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants interested in pursuing the appeal. VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE HIMANSHU 2025.12.03 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document