Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 37
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case : CPSW No. 599/2014 in SWP No. 1145/2009
Vishal Koul …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Ms. Deeksha Handoo, Advocate V/s
Mohd. Shafi Bukhari and another ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 20.12.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner nor anyone on his behalf has contacted her Office for the past several years. With reference to the Order dated February 01, 2011 vide which the petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by the Writ Court, she submits that possibly the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. She submits that let the petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. And, just in case any dispute/cause of action/interest still survives, liberty be granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for revival of the proceedings and necessary orders.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with liberty prayed for.
(
(ARUN PALLI)
CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu : 20.12.2025 Pawan Chopra/Secy
Pawan Chopra 2025.12.22 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document