179 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA VIKRAM DEV SINGH SARANG NAMRATA KHANNA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms. Bindya Sharma, Mr. Maheshinder Singh Sidhu, Addl. Standing Counsel, UT, Chandigarh and Ms. Aashna Gill, Advocat, Panel Counsel Chandigarh for respondent No.1. Mr. Karanvir Singh Kathuria, Advocate, Central Govt. Counsel for Union of India Ms. Urvashi Singh, Advocate HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel submits that order passed in CWP In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dis Rule discharged. 10.03.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: VIKRAM DEV SINGH SARANG Versus NAMRATA KHANNA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Bindya Sharma, Advocate for the Mr. Maheshinder Singh Sidhu, Addl. Standing Counsel, UT, Chandigarh and Ms. Aashna Gill, Advocat, Panel Counsel Chandigarh for respondent No.1. Mr. Karanvir Singh Kathuria, Advocate, Central Govt. Counsel for Union of India with Ms. Urvashi Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that order passed in CWP-12485-2024 has now been complied with. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Rule discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4752-2024 Date of Decision: March 10, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Maheshinder Singh Sidhu, Addl. Standing Counsel, UT, Ms. Aashna Gill, Advocat, Panel Counsel for UT Chandigarh for respondent No.1. Mr. Karanvir Singh Kathuria, Advocate, Central Govt. with for respondent No.2. Learned State counsel submits that order dated 24.05.2024 2024 has now been complied with. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law missed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 March 10, 2025 dated 24.05.2024 In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, with liberty to avail his TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.03.11 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document