Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13737 (RAJ)

TEEKAM SINGH S/O SHRI RAMBABU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/4651/2025 · 2025-04-02

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14766] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4651/2025 1. Teekam Singh S/o Shri Rambabu, R/o Nagla, Tehsil Basedi, District Dholpur (Raj.) 2. Vinod Singh S/o Shri Rambabu, R/o Nagla, Tehsil Basedi, District Dholpur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Dholpur (Raj.) 2. Sub Divisional Officer, Basedi, District Dholpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 02/04/2025 1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been made to the show- cause notice dated 03.03.2025 issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Basedi, District Dholpur, in respect of recalling orders of conversion of the land of Khasra No.2213 situated at Revenue Village Basedi-2, Tehsil Basedi, District Dholpur. 2. Indisputably, petitioners have submitted response/ reply to the impugned notice and proceedings are sub-judice before the Sub-Divisional Officer, who is expected to consider the reply and pass order(s) in accordance with law pursuant to the impugned notice dated 03.03.2025. Hence, at this stage, no interference is [2025:RJ-JP:14766] (2 of 2) [CW-4651/2025] required by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In such view of the matter, counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 3. Permission is granted. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/56