Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137354 (ALL)

SANDHYA DEVI PANDEY PNO 840600503 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/4150/2025 · 2025-05-01

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25067-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4150 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sandhya Devi Pandey Pno 840600503 Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar,Sandeep Kumar Ojha,Shahid Salam,Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. We have already decided the earlier writ petition of the petitioner bearing Writ C No. 3478 of 2025 on 11.04.2025 in the following terms: "1. Heard. 2. The petitioner a widow seeks quashing of the notice dated 10.03.2025 by which she has been asked to vacate the premises which she has been occupying even after the death of her husband on 30.06.2022, who was a Constable in 30th Battalion P.A.C., Gonda. The contention is that the children of the petitioner are studying, therefore, she be allowed to retain the accommodation for a period of six months. These are matters to be considered by the concerned authorities and not by this Court. The petitioner may approach the Commandant, 30th Battallion P.A.C., Gonda. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of." 3. Now the rejection order is sought to be challenged. 4. These are not matters to be seen under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the reasons already mentioned in the earlier order. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to pursue other remedy, if there is a cause. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 1.5.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench