MRITYUNJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAMAMI GANGE EVAM GRAMIN JAL APURTI LKO.
WRIA/4716/2025 · 2025-04-30
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137346 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137346 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24955 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4716 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mrityunjay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Namami Gange Evam Gramin Jal Apurti Lko. Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap Singh,Ranjit Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent.
2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be suffice in case respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer.
4. Perused the record.
5. Considering the above and without entering into merit of the case, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation to the respondent within two weeks' from today. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent shall decide the same within four weeks' thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned
order.
Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench