Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137340 (ALL)

ABDULLAH KHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECRY. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ,LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/4135/2025 · 2025-04-30

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24870-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4135 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abdullah Khan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secry. Department Of Revenue ,Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Shankar Singh,Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner has some dispute with the private opposite party. A writ petition directly under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not a remedy, especially as, the District Magistrate does not have any power / authority to decide such disputes between such private opposite parties. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to pursue other remedies, if there is a cause. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench