Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24715 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 392 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shyam Lal And Another Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ayodhya And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Sri Onkar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Hemant Kumar Pandey, learned State counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 22.04.2025 passed by the opposite party no. 1 i.e. Deputy Director of Consolidation Ayodhya in Revision no. 3028 of 2025 (Shyam Lal Vs Brijendra Pratap Singh & others) under section 48(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act, up to extent by means of which the order dated 18.03.2025 passed by SOC has not been stayed (Annexure No. 1). II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opp. Party no. 1 to stay the execution and implementation of the order dated 18.03.2025 passed by Settlement Officer Of Consolidation up to the extent (Annexure No. 7)." Considering the facts of the case particularly that the revision i.e. Revision No. 3028 of 2025 (Shyam Lal Vs Brijendra Pratap Singh & others), filed under section 48(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953 (in short "Act of 1953") challenging the order dated 18.03.2025, whereby, the Case No. ववजदवयरव/142/2024 (Harish Chandra and others vs. State), under Section 9-A(2) of the Act of 1953 has been transferred from the court of Consolidation Officer, Milkipur to the court of Consolidation Officer, Sadar, is fixed for 01.05.2025, the present petition, without interfering in the impugned order(s), is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 1/Revisional Authority namely Deputy Director of Consolidation, District- Ayodhya (in short "DDC") to consider and decide the said revision most expeditiously say within a period of two month from the next date fixed in it after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party after taking note of various aspects of the case and pronouncements on the subject including the judgment dated 02.04.2025 passed by this Court in Writ-B No. 276 of 2025 (Deep Singh vs. Consolidation Commissioner, Lko. And Others). The petitioner is also at liberty to prefer an application seeking interim protection in the aforesaid revision, which, if moved, shall also be considered and decided as per by law by DDC after affording full opportunity of hearing to the side opposite. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority/Court concerned shall be free to decide the aforesaid case strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench