TAHIRA v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE TEHSIL ROORKEE
WPMS/3630/2024 · 2025-01-07
Alok Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13731 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13731 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:179 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
7TH JANUARY, 2025
Writ Petition No. 3630 of 2024 (M/S)
Mrs. Tahira
...Petitioner
Versus
Sub Divisional Magistrate
…Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Faizan Ali, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Devendra Singh
Bohra, Standing Counsel. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :-
“(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to measure and to complete the area as per revenue record of the said agriculture land. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to decide the representation which is moved by petitioner (as contained Annexure no-1 of writ petition). (III) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2025:UHC:179 2 (IV) Award cost of the petitioner.”
2. Heard Mr. Faizan Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Devendra Singh Bohra, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 3. Mr. Faizan Ali, Advocate, has contended that the petitioner is the bhumidhar of 0.2540 hectares of khasra no. 212 in khata no. 00196 situated at village Mohanpura Mohammadpur, Pargana and Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. She had filed an application before the revenue authority for measurement of her said land. No action was taken on the said application. Therefore, she submitted a representation dated 06.11.2024 (annexure no.1 to the writ petition) to the respondent, which is still pending. 4. Mr. Faizan Ali, Advocate, has requested to decide the present writ petition directing the respondent to decide the said representation dated 06.11.2024 as expeditiously as possible. 5. Mr. Devendra Singh Bohra, Advocate, has requested six weeks’ time to decide the said application. 6. With the consent of both the parties, the present Writ Petition (WPMS No. 3630 of 2024) is
2025:UHC:179 3 disposed of directing the respondent to decide the said representation dated 06.11.2024 (annexure no.1 to the writ petition) as expeditiously as possible, but not later than six weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.
__________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt: 07.01.2025 Shiv/
SHIV PRASAD Digitally signed by SHIV PRASAD DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=acdf10a01e98b19449a7dc3beb4e294826f188e8b0b97f5b563 a10cdbc9a7e37, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=4CD0F168562014610493BB96ADC0F2DE74454B24EE89 DAA5FC5D31E01760E37D, cn=SHIV PRASAD Date: 2025.01.07 18:02:40 +05'30'