TARIF MEHMOOD v. SANDEEP KR NAYAK,SECY.P.D.D.AND ANR.
CPSW/372/2015 · 2025-12-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13730 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13730 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 47
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CJ Court Case: - CPSW No. 372/2015 in SWP No. 1712/2015
Tarif Mehmood …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. M Tariq Mughal, Advocate
V/s
Sandeep Kr. Nayak and another ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 20.12.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition at hand is pending since 2015 and for the past several years neither the petitioner nor anyone on his behalf has contacted his Office. With reference to the Order dated June 09, 2015 vide which the petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by the Writ Court, he submits that possibly the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. He submits that let the petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. And, just in case any dispute/cause of action/interest still survives, liberty be granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for revival of the proceedings and necessary orders.
Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with liberty prayed for.
(ARUN PALLI)
CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu 20.12.2025 Pawan Chopra/Secy.
Pawan Chopra 2025.12.22 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document