cran1391.24 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1391 OF 2024 Ratilal Vansing Parmar VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Narwade Vinayak P APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. A.M. Phule Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Majir S.Shaikh (appointed) ….. CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 2nd APRIL, 2025 PER COURT :- After hearing learned advocate for the applicant for some time, when the disinclination is shown, upon the instructions from the applicant, learned advocate for the applicant prays for withdrawal of the application. Hence, application stands dismissed of as withdrawn. 2. We quantify the legal fees and expenses of advocate Mr. Majit S. Shaikh, who was appointed to represent the cause of respondent No.2, for Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five thousand), to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.) rlj/ 2025:BHC-AUG:9789-DB