Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137263 (ALL)

KAILASH v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/4691/2025 · 2025-04-29

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24529 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4691 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kailash Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dwijendra Mishra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 and Sri Dwijendra Mishra, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 & 3. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:- "I Issue, a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to the opposite parties specifically to the opposite party no 3, Unit Head [M] I.T.I. Ltd. Mankapur Distt. Gonda to forthwith make Payment Of interest on the amount paid to petitioner towards Payment of Privileged Leave Encashment amounting Rs. 2,50,908 and 94 paise from the date of retirement date 31.05.2015 till the date of actual payment of the said Amount i.e. date 21.03.2020." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.3 i.e. Unit Head [M], I.T.I. Limited, Mankapur, District- Gonda taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 29.4.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench