Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13726 (CHH)

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED v. DHANSAY

MCC/338/2025 · 2025-04-08

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:16381 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 338 of 2025 1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through The Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 1) 2. The Chief General Manager South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Korba Area, District Korba Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 2) 3. The Sub Area Manager Saraipali, Open Cast Mining Project, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Korba Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 3) ... Applicant(s) versus 1. Dhansay S/o Chhotelal Aged About 39 Years R/o Village And Post Budbud, P.S. And Tahsil Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh (Petitioner) 2. The Collector District Korba Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 4) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicants : Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Vikas Ghritlahre, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate For State/Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 08. 04.2025 1. Office objection is ignored. 2. The present MCC has been filed for extension of time to comply with the order dated 15.01.2025 passed in WPC No. 6289 of 2024 wherein, the present applicants/SECL have been directed to consider the claim of the present respondent No. 1 within period of 45 days. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.04.08 14:07:20 +0530 2 3. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicants that the authorities have initiated steps to complete the proceeding and it would be completed at the earliest. The learned counsel for the applicants pray for extension of time to complete the proceeding. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for respective respondents would oppose. 5. Considering the reasons assigned in the present MCC, prayer of extension of time is allowed and applicants are granted further 30 days time to comply with the order passed in WPC No. 6289 of 2024. 6. Accordingly, the instant MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant