Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13725 (AP)

E-AHLE HADEES SIRIVELLA v. Smt.Rajakumari Ganiya, IAS

CC/907/2025 · 2025-07-17

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010166872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 907/2025 Between: 1. E-AHLE HADEES SIRIVELLA, A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE ANDHRA PRADESH SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 2001, WITH REGISTRATION NO.225 OF 2019 ON THE FILE OF THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES, NANDYAL, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT D.NO.11/145, SIRIYELLA, SIRVEL, KUMOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT PESARAYI IBRAHEEM, S/O PESARAYI NADIPI SHAIKSHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O H.NO. 1-39/2, DEGALAPETA, SIRVEL, NANDYALA DISTRICT - 518 563. 2. PESARAYI IBRAHEEM,, S/O PESARAYI NADIPI SHAIKSHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O H.NO. 1 -3 9/2 DEGALAPETA, SIRVEL, NANDYALA DISTRICT - 518 563, ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SMT RAJAKUMARI GANIYA IAS, , S/o. Not known to the Petitioner District Collector, D.No.FF7H plus R3J, Industrial Area, Nandyal District, Collectorate, Nandyal. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience to the orders of this Honourable Court 06.05.2024 in W.P. No. 17931/2024 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BANDA SAI SAMPATH KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: ORDER Sri K.Vijaya Raju, learned counsel, representing Sri B.Sai Sampath, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has been complied with and this Contempt Case may be closed. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR