136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.600 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.02.2025 State of Haryana and others …Appellants Versus Pratima and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the appellants. Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate Mr. Vikrant Koundal, Advocate Mr. Mohd. Tarif, Advocate for respondent No.1-Caveator. ***** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) 1. Admittedly, the writ petition is pending before learned Single Judge. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the order assailed before this Court is on erroneous facts and the very foundation is, therefore, erroneous and the order, therefore, deserves to be set-aside. 3. We are unable to accept the contention at this stage, when the writ petition is pending. There is no bar for the appellants to move appropriate application seeking a fresh order of vacation of stay bringing out all the correct facts. 4. Allowing him to move appropriate application, the present appeal is dismissed. It is made clear that learned Single Judge would, in no NEETU RANI 2025.03.03 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD LPA No.600 of 2025 (O&M) -2- way, be influenced by any of the observations made above. 5. All the pending misc applications also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE 27.02.2025 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2025.03.03 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD