Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137204 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO

BAIL/3707/2025 · 2025-09-22

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3707 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri R.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Satyendra Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 237 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 19.08.2024 against four named accused persons, including the applicant and an unnamed person stating that the co- accused persons have got a gift deed executed in favour of one Lokesh Kumar Tiwari by setting up some importer in place of complainant's deceased father. The applicant and other co- accused persons are said to be involved in setting up the importer. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in 8 other criminal cases has been disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and in the rejoinder affidavit. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the co-accused Manish has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court by means of an order dated 02.05.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Radhey Shyam Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A., Priyadarshi, Ravi Kant Shukla Anil Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s) No.2742 of 2025. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 19.02.2025. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.02.2025 and the investigation already stands concluded and a co-accused against whom similar allegations have been levelled has been granted bail by this court and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant-Anil Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 22, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 3707 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench