Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13720 (UTT)

VEER SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/960/2024 · 2025-07-16

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR No.960 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate for the revisionist. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. The matter is listed as defective since long – the present criminal revision was filed in the year 2024 – and since then the defect has not been cured. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has no instructions in the matter to appear as the petitioner is not turning up. 5. In view of the statement made by counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal revision is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 16.07.2025 SK