Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137153 (MAD)

Senthilmurugan v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/12756/2025 · 2025-06-04

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.12756 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P(MD)No.12756 of 2025 and WMP(MD)No.9209 of 2025 Senthilmurugan ..Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Sub Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Devakottai Police Station, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in Na.Ka.Aa2/1539/2024, dated 17.03.2025, passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Veerakumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader For R4 : M/s..M.Aasha Government Advocate 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12756 of 2025 ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Certiorari, to quash the impugned order in Na.Ka.Aa2/1539/2024, dated 17.03.2025. 2.Through the impugned order, fine was imposed against the petitioner for illegal quarrying. 3.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that notice was not received by the petitioner. The respondents were directed to provide evidence that notice was served to the petitioner. It is seen that four persons were served notice. However, one Agathiyan and one Singamuthu refused to receive notice. One Rajendra Prasad has received notice and has filed objection. 4.As far as the petitioner is concerned, even though the order states and refers that Senthilmurugan has received the notice, there is no evidence to state that he has received the notice and orders. 5.Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is serious violation 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12756 of 2025 of principles of natural justice. Therefore, the impugned order is quashed and the matter is remitted back to the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent is directed to issue notice to all the four persons, namely, Agathiyan, Singamuthu, Rajendra Prasad and Senthilmurugan within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The said persons shall submit their objections within a period of six weeks therefrom and the enquiry may be conducted within a period of eight weeks therefrom. 6.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Tmg To: 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12756 of 2025 2.The Sub Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Devakottai Police Station, Sivagangai District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12756 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY , J. Tmg ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.12756 of 2025 DATED : 04.06.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis