Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13713 (RAJ)

LALITA PRASAD GUPTA v. RAJ HIGH COURT JODHPUR ANDANR

CW/2597/2008 · 2025-03-26

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13824] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2597/2008 Lalita Prasad Gupta S/o Deena Nath, aged about 52 years, R/o 300, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur through its Registrar General. 2. District and Sessions Judge, Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : MR.Prateek Kasliwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/03/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that against the impugned orders, the petitioner submitted departmental appeal before the Appellate Authority and the appeal submitted by him was allowed vide order dated 18.04.2009 and the impugned order dated 08.02.2007 with regard to recovery of Rs.34,151/- has been set-aside. 3. Counsel submits that the aforesaid order passed by the Appellate Authority has not been assailed by the respondents, hence, under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this petition and this petition has become infructuous. [2025:RJ-JP:13824] (2 of 2) [CW-2597/2008] 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All other pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /120