Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137123 (ALL)

NEETU DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, LUCKNOW AND OTHERS

WRIA/3548/2024 · 2025-09-18

Manish Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3548 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for sending petitioner on training for the post of Asha Bahu in pursuance of select list forwarded by the Superintendent, Community Health Centre, Gondlamau, District Sitapur to the Chief Medical Officer, District Sitapur vide letter dated 02.05.2022. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned State Counsel on the basis of instructions submits that subsequently petitioner has already been sent on training, which has been completed. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that despite completion of training, however, the Training Certificate has not been issued to petitioner till date. 5. It view thereof, the opposite party no.3 i.e. Chief Medical Officer, Sitatpur or any other competent authority is directed to issue the Training Certificate to petitioner, in case she has completed a training successfully. The certificate shall be issued within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 6. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Manish Mathur,J.) Neetu Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Medical And Health Services, Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench