Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13712 (MAD)

MANIKANDAN v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

CRL OP/1392/2025 · 2025-01-22

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.1392 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.01.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.1392 of 2025 Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri, Tamilnadu 635 001. 2. The State represented by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Baratiya Nagarik Suraksh Sanhita, to direct the respondents not to harass to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1392 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on receipt of summon, the petitioner appeared before the second respondent Police and produced all the documents. Though the petitioner appeared before the respondent-Police for enquiry, still the respondent-Police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. Hence, he filed this criminal original petition. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that based on the complaint, the petitioner was summoned and he appeared before the respondent Police https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1392 of 2025 once. Subsequently, the petitioner has not appeared before the respondent-Police for recording statement. The respondent Police is not harassing the petitioner. 5. Upon receipt of the complaint, it is the duty of the police either to conduct enquiry or to investigate the matter and the same might not be amounted to harassment. The petitioner is directed to extend his cooperation to the respondent-Police/Investigating Officer for completion of investigation. 6. With the abovesaid direction, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 22.01.2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1392 of 2025 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri, Tamilnadu 635 001. 2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1392 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN, J. mfa Crl.O.P.No.1392 of 2025 22.01.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis