HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34603 of 2013 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Shashwat Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Bharat Bhushan Paul, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.C. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. 2. It is informed that the controversy in question is covered by Division Bench of this Court in Writ-C No.68915 of 2014 (Ram Nivas Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Secretary and others). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment passed in Writ-C No.68915 of 2014 (Ram Nivas Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Secretary and others) and impugned notification dated 11.05.2012 under Section 6(1)/16 of Land Acquisition Act issued by Special Secretary, U.P. Shasan, Awas and Shahari Niyojan is quashed so far as the petitioners, their heirs and legal representatives are concerned. September 23, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bharat Bhushan Paul Counsel for Respondent(s) : M.C. Chaturvedi (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Atar Singh And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad