FATIMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. HOME SECY. AT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
ABAIL/1681/2022 · 2025-08-20
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137079 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137079 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48881 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1681 of 2022 Applicant :- Fatima Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Home Secy. At Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Neeta Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Case called out. None appears for the applicant however, learned A.G.A. is present. Learned A.G.A. submits that anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 376(A-B) which is barred under Section 438 sub-section (6) of Cr.P.C. . In view of specific statutory bar, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench