Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13707 (CHH)

RAJKUMAR AGRAWAL v. ASHOK KUMAR AGRAWAL

WPC/1277/2020 · 2025-04-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:16247 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1277 of 2020 • Rajkumar Agrawal S/o Babulal Aged About 54 Years Caste Agrawal Resident Of Katchhari Chowk , Sakti, Police Station And Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. Ashok Kumar Agrawal S/o Satyanarayan Agrawal Resident Of Katchhari Chowk Sakti , Police Station And Tahsil Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2. Chandrashekhar Agrawal S/o Satyanarayan Agrawal Resident Of Katchhari Chowk Sakti , Police Station And Tahsil Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3. Suresh Kumar Agrawal S/o Satyanarayan Agrawal Resident Of Katchhari Chowk Sakti , Police Station And Tahsil Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4. Kailash Agrawal S/o Satyanarayan Agrawal Resident Of Katchhari Chowk Sakti, Police Station And Tahsil Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5. Smt. Chandravati W/o Satyanarayan Agrawal Resident Of Katchhari Chowk Sakti, Police Station And Tahsil Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6. Kunj Bihari Baiswade (Ex Halka Patwari) Village Sakti, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue the order or directions to expedite trial in the matter of Rajkumar Agrawal Vs. Ashok Kumar Agrawal which is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sakti, Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh and to complete proceeding within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue any other writ or writs/ order or orders/ direction or directions which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti