SATYA NARAYAN MISHRA AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF AGRICULTURE EDUCATION/RESEARCH LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/4662/2025 · 2025-04-29
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24381 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4662 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Mishra And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Agriculture Education/Research Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Shukla,Aneeta Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and Sri Satyanshu Ojha, Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 & 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to pay arrears of minimum of regular pay scale for Class-IV post as per the 7th Pay Commission report to the petitioner w.e.f 01.01.2016 till the date of respective retirement after adjusting the amount already paid to them. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that all the petitioners have already been retired/disengaged. Further, contention is that this aspect of the matter has already been by this Court in Writ-A No. 692 of 2025 Inre; Ram Kishor Yadav & Anr Vs. State of U.P and Ors decided on 21.01.2025, a copy of which is annexure 13 to the writ petition and it is prayed that respondents be directed to consider the claim of the petitioners in the light of the aforesaid judgment passed in the case of Ram Kishor Yadav (supra). To the aforesaid prayer, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents have no objection. Considering the aforesaid, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider the claim of the petitioners for payment of arrears of minimum of regular pay scale for Class-IV post as prescribed by 7th Pay Commission w.e.f 01.01.2016 till the petitioners were retired/disengaged from service in the light of the judgment of
this Court in the case of Ram Kishor Yadav (supra). Let such a consideration be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case as set forth by the petitioners.
Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench