SARDAR JOGINDER SINGH and OTHERS v. NIRMAL ROBINSON CLIFFORD and ANOTHER
A227/5649/2020 · 2025-01-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137040 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137040 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1162
Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5649 of 2020 Petitioner :- Sardar Joginder Singh And Others Respondent :- Nirmal Robinson Clifford And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mehrotra,Ishwar Dutt Shukla,Priyam Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- Akhilesh Kalra,Shyam Mohan Pradhan Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri L.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Present petition has been filed challenging an order whereby application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC was allowed.
3. The appellate Court recorded that filing of the additional document would not adversely affect the petitioner in any way.
4. I do not see any reason to take a view different from the view taken by the appellate authority. The petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 7.1.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench