Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137037 (ALL)

SHYAM LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/4666/2025 · 2025-04-29

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24376 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4666 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shyam Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimlesh Kumar,Ved Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh,Ravi Prakash Yadav Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Vimlesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Amit Kumar Rai, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1, Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 & 3 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.4 & 5. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:- "a) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the due GPF compound interest amounting to Rs. 1,00,000 (approx.) for the period from 12/09/2023 to 05/08/2024 forthwith in favor of the petitioner." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 and this Court may direct opposite party no.4 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.4 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Ambedkar Nagar taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 29.4.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench