Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13702 (CHH)

HARISH SINGH SIDAR v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1855/2025 · 2025-03-20

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:13265 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1855 of 2025 1 - Harish Singh Sidar S/o Shri Jagdev Singh Sidar Aged About 34 Years Occupation- District Social Audit Facilitator, District- Gariyaband, R/o Ram Nagar, Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Chhattisgarh Social Audit Unit Raipur, Old D.R.D.A. Bhawan, Collectorate, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Zila Panchayat Gariyaband Through - Its Chief Executive Officer, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 20/03/2025 AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.03.22 10:53:35 +0530 2 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondents for payment of the salary for the month of August, 2024 to September, 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has worked for the respondent No.2 as Fixed Time Employee(FTE), District Social Audit Facilitator and In-charge Social Audit Manager at District: Bilaspur, Raigarh and Gariyaband, but the petitioner’s salary for the said period i.e. August, 2024 to September, 2024 has not been released by the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that if the petitioner approach the respondent No.2 by filing a representation claiming the salary for a period of August, 2024 to September, 2024, the same shall be considered in accordance with law after verifying the fact that the petitioner has discharged his duties in the concerned department. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the respondent No.2 by filing a representation within a period of ten days, thereafter, the same be considered after verifying the fact that whether the petitioner has worked for a period of August, 2024 to September, 2024 or not and necessary order be passed accordingly. If the petitioner is 3 worked for the aforesaid period, the salary for the two months be released within a further period of 30 days after filing the representation. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep