APHC010166472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9259 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-3 [3446] M/s. Geetha Enterprises and others ...Petitioners Vs. Union of India and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for petitioners : Ms. P. Haritha, learned counsel representing Sri Petluri Naga Raju Advocate for respondents : None CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 17th April 2025 P C : In view of the fact that the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act of 2002 (for short, “the SARFAESI Act”) provides an effective alternate remedy by way of an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, which can very well be availed by the petitioners, we do not find any reason to interfere at this stage by invoking our extraordinary jurisdiction considering the ratio of the judgments rendered by the Apex Court in Radha Krishan Industries v. State of H.P.,1 and United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tondon2. 1 (2021) 6 SCC 771 2 [(2010)8 SCC 110 : 2010 INSC 428] 2 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J AMD 3 28 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9259 of 2025 Dt:17.04.2025 AMD