VISHAL MUDILA ALIAS VISHAL SINGH MUDILA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/1422/2024 · 2025-02-20
Pankaj Purohit
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13699 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13699 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.1422 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. TPS Takuli, learned counsel for the petitioner with petitioner.
2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned B.H. for the State.
3. Mr. B.S. Bhandari, learned counsel for respondent no.3 is present. However, respondent no.3 and victim are not present.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition itself.
5. Permission granted.
6. Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
20.02.2025
R.Dang