Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13697 (HP)

AYUSH SONI v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/1007/2025 · 2025-05-15

Virender Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:HHC:14075 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MP (M) Nos.954 & 1007 of 2025 Reserved on      :     13th May, 2025 Decided on        :     15th May, 2025 Cr.MP (M) No.954 of 2025 Jermanjeet Kaur …Applicant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Cr.MP (M) No.1007 of 2025 Ayush Soni …Applicant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh,  Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the applicant(s)   : Mr. Jeevan Kumar & Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocates. For the respondent   : Mr. Varun Chandel, Mr. H.S. Rawat, and   Mr. Mohinder   Zharaick, Additional Advocates General assisted by ASI Sunit Kumar, Police Station Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) Virender Singh, Judge The  above   named  applicants  have  filed  these applications, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha   Sanhita,   2023   (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the 'BNSS'), with a prayer to release them on bail, during the pendency   of   trial,   in   case   FIR   No.17   of   2025,   dated 22.01.2025, registered, under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of the   Narcotic   Drugs   and   Psychotropic   Substances   Act, (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the   ‘NDPS   Act’),   with   Police Station, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. 2. According to the applicants, they are innocent persons and have falsely been implicated by the Police in the   present   case   and   presently,   they   are   in   judicial custody. 3. Both the applicants have put forward the fact that   except   the   present   case,   no   other   case   has   been registered against them. 4. Applicant Ayush Soni has asserted the fact that he is working in Merchant Navy and in the month of May, 2024, returned back to India. Thereafter, he was trying to 3 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) get   admission   for   higher   education   and   transferred   the amount of Rs.2,53,000/­ to the account of his co­accused. 5. It is the further case of the applicants that the investigation,   in   the   present   case,   is   complete   and   no useful purpose would be served by keeping them in judicial custody, as chances of commencement and conclusion of the trial against them, in near future, are not so bright. 6. Applicants have filed similar applications before learned Special Judge­III, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, however, their applications have been dismissed vide order dated 2.4.2025 and 17.04.2025. 7. On the basis of the above facts, learned counsel appearing   for   the   applicants   have   given   certain undertakings, to which, the applicants are ready to abide by, in case, the applicants are ordered to be released on bail. 8. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the applications. 9. When   put   to   notice,   the   police   has   filed   the status   report,   disclosing   therein,   on   22.01.2025,   HC 4 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) Shashi Pal No.39, along with other police officials, was on patrolling duty in official vehicle No.HP39E­3253. 9.1. At about 12.50 a.m., in the midnight, when the I.O.,   along   with   other   police   officials,   reached   at   Petrol Pump Sakoh, then he noticed a vehicle coming in the high speed from Gaggal side. 9.2. On seeing the police vehicle, driver of the said vehicle, all of a sudden take a cut and drove the vehicle at a very high speed towards Sakoh side, as such, the I.O. raised suspicion in his mind that some objectionable item could be there in the  vehicle, as such,  he directed the driver of his vehicle to chase the said vehicle, registration number of which was HP39B­9902. 9.3. When,   the   police   vehicle   was   chasing   the vehicle   bearing   registration   No.HP39B­9902,   its   driver increased its speed, upon which, the I.O. informed SI Vijay Singh, who was already on patrolling, to intercept the said vehicle coming on the Sakoh road. 9.4. After chasing the said vehicle, the driver of the said vehicle drove the vehicle through Radio Colony link road   towards   Chilgadi,   however,   in   that   process,   the 5 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) vehicle struck against the RCC retaining wall. Thereafter, three   boys   were   found   to   have   alighted   down   from   the vehicle, who ran towards Rodikut road side. 9.5. One boy was nabbed by ASI Vijay Singh, at a distance of 20 meters, however, other persons could not be nabbed, as it was the night time. The person, so nabbed, gave a fist blow on the right eye of ASI Vijay Singh. The said person was overpowered by other police officials. On inquiry, he disclosed his name as Shanshak Bisht. He also disclosed the names of his companion, who allegedly ran away from the sport, as Ayush Soni and Shwetang Shahi @ Shinu. 9.6. Constable Abhishek Kumar was sent to arrange independent witness. At about 1.25 a.m., he came back with one person namely Manoj Kumar, who was associated as   independent   witness. In   the   presence   of   said independent   witnesses,   the   vehicle   was   searched   and during search, from underneath the foot mat of front seat, a transparent polythene was found along with electronic weighing scale. 6 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) 9.7. When  the said  polythene  was  opened, brown coloured granual shaped substance was found, which on smelling and on the basis of experience was found to be Chitta/heroin. Accused Shashank Bisht also confirmed the said fact. On weighment, the same was found to be 30 grams of Chitta. 10. After completion of other codal formalities, the FIR,   in   question,   was   registered   and   the   accused   was arrested. The contraband along with the vehicle was taken into possession. 11. Thereafter, the medico­legal examination of ASI Vijay Singh was got conducted. On 22.1.2025, applicant Ayush Soni and accused Shwetang Kumar Shahi @ Shinu, were also associated in the investigation and were arrested. 12. During investigation, applicant Ayush Soni and accused Shwetang Kumar Shahi @ Shinu, has disclosed that   Raman   Kumar   is   also   dealing   in   the   business   of Chitta/Heroin. FIR   No.13/25,   dated   15.1.2025,   under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, was found to be registered with Police Station, Dharamshala against accused Raman Kumar @ Rambo. 7 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) 13. Raman Kumar has introduced applicant Ayush Soni and accused Shwetang Kumar Shahi @ Shinu with the smuggler of Chitta namely Maninder Singh. Against said Maninder Singh, case bearing FIR No.18/25, dated 24.01.2025, registered under Section 21, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act was found to be registered with Police Station Dharamshala. Accused Raman Kumar was arrested in FIR No.13/25 on 15.1.2025. 14. During investigation, involvement of Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar was also found, who were stated to have been arrested in FIR No.18/25. 15. On 24.1.2025, custody of Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar was transferred from case No.18/25 to this case and they were arrested on 27.1.2025. 16. During   investigation,   it   has   also   been   found that applicant Ayush and accused Shinu used to transfer the   amount   in   the   account   of   one   Kulwant   Kaur   and thereafter, Kulwant Kaur used to transfer the said amount in the account of applicant Jermanjeet Kaur. 17. Accused Shwetang Kumar Sahi has transferred a sum of Rs.1,88,000/­, whereas, applicant Ayush Soni 8 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) has transferred a sum of Rs.2,53,000/­ to the account of Kulwant   Kaur. The   said   amount   was   transferred   for purchasing   Chita. Applicant   Jermanjeet   Kaur   in connivance with her mother has transferred the amount of Rs.8,40,370/­ in her bank account. 18. Thereafter, the service provider was requested to   provide   the   CDRs   of   mobile   number   of   accused Shwetang   Kumar   Shahi,   applicant   Ayush,   accused Shashank and applicant Jermanjeet Kaur. On perusal of those   CDRs,   location   was   accused   applicant   Ayush, accused Shashank and Shwetang Kumar Shahi was found to   be   in   the   area   of   Dharamshala   to   Daulatpur,   on 21.01.2025,   at   4.30   p.m.,   whereas,   their   location   was found to be at Dharamshala, on 12.30 a.m, at 22.1.2025. 19. It has also been found in the investigation that accused Shwetang Kumar, applicant Ayush and accused Shashank had purchased Chitta from accused Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar at Mubirakpur, during night of 21.1.2025. Accused Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar were arrested in FIR No. 18/25, registered under Section 9 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. Accused Kulwant Kaur was arrested on 2.3.2025. 20. During investigation, it was found that accused Kuwant   Kaur   had   transferred   the   said   amount   to   the account of her daughter applicant Jermanjeet Kaur and applicant Jermanjeet Kaur was proceeding towards Delhi Airport,   as   her   flight   to   Canada   was   scheduled   for 3.3.2025, at 5.35 a.m.  She was nabbed at Delhi Airport on 3.3.2025, at about 3.30 a.m. and was arrested. 21. After   completion   of   the   investigation,   charge­ sheet has been filed against applicant Ayush, Shwetang, Shashank, Maninder Rakesh, Kulwant Kaur and applicant Jermanjeet   Kaur,   in   the   Court   of   learned   Additional Sessions Judge­IV, Fast Track Court POCSO, Kangra at Dharamshala. The   case   is   now   fixed   for   2.6.2025,   for consideration on charge. 22. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the applications. 23. The   contraband   allegedly   recovered   from   the possession of accused persons, in this case, does not fall within   the   definition   of   commercial   quantity,   as   such, 10 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable, in the present case. 24. Once, it has been held that rigors of Section 37 of   the   NDPS   Act   are   not   applicable,   then,   the   next question, which arises for determination, before this Court, is as to whether the applicants are entitled to the relief as claimed in the applications or not. 25. Investigation, in the present case, is complete as such, it can be said that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is not required by the Police. Moreover, the chances   of   commencement   and   conclusion   of   the   trial against the accused persons, in near future, are not so bright. 26. Except the present case, no other case is found to have been registered against the applicants, as such, the presumption   of   innocence   is   still   available   to   the applicants. 27. The bail  application  cannot  be rejected, as  a matter   of   punishment,   as,   pre­trial   punishment   is prohibited   under   the   law   and   punishment   can   only   be 11 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) imposed, after the full fledged trial, by competent Court of law. 28. Considering all these facts, this Court is of the view that the bail applications are liable to be allowed and are accordingly allowed. The applicants are ordered to be released   on   bail   in   case   FIR   No.17   of   2025,   dated 22.01.2025, registered, under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act, with Police Station, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., on their furnishing personal bonds, in the sum of Rs.70,000/­ each, with two sureties each, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. 29. This order of release, however, shall be subject to the following conditions :­ “a)   Applicants shall appear before the I.O., as and when directed by the I.O. to do so and regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date  of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek   exemption   from   appearance   by   filing appropriate application; b) Applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence   nor   hamper   the   investigation   of   the case in   any   manner whatsoever; c)     Applicants   shall   not   make   any   inducement, threat   or   promises   to   any   person   acquainted with the facts of  the case  so  as  to  dissuade them  from disclosing such facts to the Court or the   Police Officer; and 12 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) d) Applicants shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court.” 30. Any of the observations made herein above shall not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case as these observations are confined only to the disposal of the present bail applications. 31. It is made clear that the respondent­State is at liberty to move an appropriate application, in case, any of the   bail   conditions   is   found   to   be   violated   by   the   bail applicants/petitioners. 32. The Registry is directed to forward a soft copy of the bail order to the Superintendent of Jail, Lala Lajpat Rai Open   Air   Correctional   Home,   Dharamshala,   District Kangra, through e­mail, with a direction to enter the date of grant of bail in the e­prison software. 33. In case, the   applicants are not released within a period of seven   days   from   the   date   of   grant of bail, the Superintendent of Jail, Lala Lajpat Rai Open Air Correctional   Home,   Dharamshala,   District   Kangra,  is directed to inform this fact to the Secretary, DLSA, Kangra at Dharamshala. The  Superintendent of Jail, Lala Lajpat 13 ( 2025:HHC:14075 ) Rai   Open   Air   Correctional   Home,   Dharamshala,   District Kangra,  is further directed that if the applicants fail to furnish the bail bonds, as per the order passed by this Court, within a period of one month from today, then, the said fact be submitted to this Court. ( Virender Singh ) Judge May 15, 2025(ps) Digitally signed by RAJNI Date: 2025.05.15 16:10:54 IST