SMT. VIDYA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/4689/2025 · 2025-04-29
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24543 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4689 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Vidya Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Dileep Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1, 2 & 3 and Dr. Uday Veer Singh,
learned counsel for opposite parties no.4 & 5.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:-
"i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding the opp. parties to pay the gratuity dues of the husband of the petitioner to the petitioner with interest with the effect from 29.7.2013, when the husband of the petitioner died during tenure of service."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.4 and this Court may direct opposite party no.4 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.4 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Gonda taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law,
with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 29.4.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench