2025:JHHC:16381 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(Cr.) No.367 of 2025 ----- Amresh Kumar, son of Ramasharya Singh, resident of Garh Bari, Lawar Hatia, PO Hatia, PS Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi, at present resident of village Bumru, PO Hardag, PS Dhurwa (Tupudana OP), District Ranchi … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, PO and PS Kotwali 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dhurwa, Ranchi 4.The Officer-in-Charge, Dhurwa (Tupudana) Police Station, Dhurwa, Ranchi 5.The Investigating Officer, Dhurwa (Tupudana) Police Station, PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi 6.Pankaj Kumar Singh, son of Ram Chandra Singh, Resident of 1 Shifted Area, Vastu Vihar Colony, Khunti Road, PO Tupudana, PS Tupudana, District Ranchi … Respondents. CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-I …...... 03 /19.06.2025: In this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayers: “for issuance of appropriate and suitable writ(s)/order(s) or direction(s) for respondent authorities are not taking any cognizance after lodging the FIR against the accused persons, in connection with Dhurwa (T) PS Case No. 407 of 2023 dated 23.12.2023 for the offence under sections 341, 323, 448, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code now pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in as much as the criminal proceeding was not initiated against the accused person is an abuse of the process of law. And/or For issuance of appropriate and suitable writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) for free and fair investigation of the entire criminal proceeding initiated against the accused persons. And/or For issuance of such other writ, order or direction as may appear just and proper for doing conscionable justice to the petitioner and in the interest of justice.” 2. From the argument and the prayer an impression is given to this Court that this petitioner has filed this writ petition that inspite of registering the FIR the Police is not taking steps. 3. During course of argument, learned counsel for the State submitted that after investigation chargesheet has already been 2025:JHHC:16381 submitted in this case on 07.06.2024 under sections 341, 323, 448, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code against one Bilal and Pankaj Kumar Singh. 4. Considering the fact that the investigation has been concluded and the chargesheet has been submitted, this writ petition has become infructuous, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/