COCP-671 271 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Naresh Kumar Sh.Govind Mohan and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, that the benefits due to the petitioner have been sanctioned and the same along with cost imposed vide order dated 16.01.2025 shall be released in his favour within 04 weeks from today. 2. does not press th 3. 4. stand disposed of. 5. aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum 71-2025 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: Naresh Kumar VERSUS Sh.Govind Mohan and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr.Mohit Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel representing the benefits due to the petitioner have been sanctioned and the same along with cost imposed vide order dated 16.01.2025 shall be released in his favour within 04 weeks from today. In such circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 671-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.02.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mohit Rathee, Advocate Ramesh Sharma, Advocate Learned counsel representing the respondents submits benefits due to the petitioner have been sanctioned and the same along with cost imposed vide order dated 16.01.2025 shall be released in his favour within 04 weeks from today. In such circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner Dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum submits benefits due to the petitioner have been sanctioned and the same along with cost imposed vide order dated 16.01.2025 shall be In such circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.01 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-671 of Rs.50,000/ petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application 27.02.2025 sanjay 71-2025 (O&M) [2] Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. .2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE er speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.01 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document