Crl.O.P(MD)No.7797 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.7797 of 2025 Vijay ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep By, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2. The Inspector of Police, Cumbum South Police Station, Cumbum, Theni District. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Cumbum South Police Station, Cumbum, Theni District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent and his police officials for not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry based on the petitioner's online complaint dated 22.04.2025. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7797 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vidhya Sagar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondents and his police officials not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry, based on the petitioner's online complaint dated 22.04.2025. 2.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondents 2 and 3 frequently called the petitioner for enquiry and insisted him to produce the jewels without any acknowledgement. In fact, the petitioner is running Pawn broker shop with proper license. While so, in respect of the jewels pledged by one Eswari, the respondents 2 and 3 insisted the petitioner to produce those jewels without any acknowledgement and without issuing any summons. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7797 of 2025 Therefore, the petitioner sent the representation dated 22.04.2025 but the same has not been considered. Hence this petition. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that based on the complaint lodged by one Vignesh, they have called the petitioner for enquiry. In fact, one Eswari, pledged stolen jewels with the petitioner and thereby, they called him for enquiry. Apart from that, they have not harassed the petitioner as alleged in this petition. If necessary, they will issue summons to the petitioner and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 4.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the respondent police have not harassed the petitioner as alleged in this petition and only for enquiry purpose, they called the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. 28.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7797 of 2025 To 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep By, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2. The Inspector of Police, Cumbum South Police Station, Cumbum, Theni District. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Cumbum South Police Station, Cumbum, Theni District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.7797 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. LR Crl.O.P(MD)No.7797 of 2025 28.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis