Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136909 (MAD)

Mary Vijila v. The Inspector of Police

WP(MD)/12222/2025 · 2025-04-28

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD) NO.12222 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD) No.12222 of 2025 Mary Vijila ... Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Iraniyal Police Station, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action on the basis of the petitioner’s complaint dated 08.10.2024 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For petitioner :Mr. K.Gokul For respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) ***** O R D E R This petition is filed by the petitioner to direct the respondent to _____________ Page No. 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.12222 of 2025 conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action on the basis of the petitioner’s complaint dated 08.10.2024 within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner lodged a complaint before the respondent dated 08.10.2024 as against one Senthil Kannan, but the same has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner filed this petition. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) for the respondent would submit that the complaint of the petitioner was also considered and the same was closed since it is pertaining to the payment of balance sale price. Therefore, this petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. The prayer sought for in this petition is to consider his representation and the representation of the petitioner was already considered and closed by the respondent. Today, the closure report is also served to the counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to challenge the closure of the complaint in the manner known to law, if she is aggrieved. _____________ Page No. 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.12222 of 2025 5. In view of the same, preserving the liberty of the petitioner to challenge the closure of the complaint in the manner known to law, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. 28.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1. The Inspector of Police, Iraniyal Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.12222 of 2025 P.DHANABAL,J apd W.P.(MD) No.12222 of 2025 28.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis