- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8841 WP No. 1645 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 1645 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: RISHI CHOWDHURY, S/O AMIT KUMAR CHOWDHURY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O A-202, KEERTHI GARDENIA, THURBARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 066. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMARTH SHREEDHAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH ADDITIONAL TALUK OFFICE, HOTEL SHARAVATHI BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, YELHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 064. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR THASILDAR OFFICER, YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064. 4. ARSIS DEVELOPER PVT. LTD., COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8841 WP No. 1645 of 2025 COMPANIES ACT, 2013, NO. 27, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN, R.M.S COLONY, VIRGO NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 049, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING R1 TO R3 TO ENFORCE PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE FROM R4 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE FOR RECOVERY PROVIDED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND RULES THERE UNDER, FOR ENFORCEMENT OF DIRECTIONS OF K RERA AT ANNEXURE-A, THE ORDER PASSED BY K-RERA DATED 17.02.2024 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 40(1) OF REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) RULES 2017 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Notice to respondent No.4 is not necessary for the following reasons. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8841 WP No. 1645 of 2025 2. The petitioner is home buyer who was aggrieved of the inaction on the part of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in executing and implementing the orders passed by the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA). 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to an order passed by this Court under similar circumstances in respect of the very same respondent No.4. Learned counsel seeks for similar orders. 4. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to accomplish the implementations of the subject K-RERA orders and report compliance to the Registrar General of this Court within an outer limit of three months failing which heavy costs personably payable may be levied on an appropriate application being moved by the petitioner. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 CT: BHK