COCP-48 180(2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ashwani Kumar Mr.Kamal Kishore Yadav and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, claim of the petitioner ha shall be released to him within 06 weeks from today. 2. press the present petition. 3. 4. 5. stand disposed of. 6. aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that 4870-2024 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date Ashwani Kumar VERSUS Mr.Kamal Kishore Yadav and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr.Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the claim of the petitioner has been accepted and the financial benefits shall be released to him within 06 weeks from today. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 4870-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.02.2025 ...Petitioner Mr.Kamal Kishore Yadav and another ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Kapil Kakkar, Advocate Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. earned counsel for the respondents submits that the been accepted and the financial benefits shall be released to him within 06 weeks from today. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not Dismissed as not pressed. miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that earned counsel for the respondents submits that the been accepted and the financial benefits In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.01 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-48 eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/ petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 27.02.2025 sanjay 4870-2024 (O&M) [2] ventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 27.02.2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? ventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No ventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first SANJAY GUPTA 2025.03.01 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document