Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136819 (ALL)

RAJNEESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/3571/2025 · 2025-04-29

Jaspreet Singh, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24395-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3571 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Petitioner has approached this Court for the following main reliefs: "a. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties especially opposite party nos.2 and 3 to not to harass, threat or detain the petitioner and his family members in pursuance to the false complaint made by the opposite parties no.4 and 5, against the petitioner and his family members. b. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful function of the marriage of petitioner, which is going to perform on 25.04.2025." 3. Learned A.G.A., on instructions, states that there is no F.I.R. lodged with regard to petitioner and police does not require the petitioner in any matter. 4. The statement of learned A.G.A. is taken on record. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of. . [Jaspreet Singh,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench