APHC010165512020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] TUESDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 10394/2020 Between: Racharla Narayana Swamy ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. PILLIX LAW FIRM 2 The Court made the following order: The petitioner claims that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring an extent of 1011.11 sq yards in Sy.No.458 and 460-C of Ward No.18, Guntakal, Ananthapuram District, having purchased the same by virtue of Registered Sale Deed dated 20.12.2002, vide document No.1995 of 2002. It is further case of the petitioner that, the 5th respondent filed suit vide OS.No.137 of 2012, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gooty, seeking to pass judgment and decree in his favor declaring him as owner of land to an extent of 600 sq yards in Sy.No.460-B in Ward No.18, Guntakal and also sought for consequential permanent injunction. Upon contest, the said suit was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 18.02.2020, on the ground that the 5th respondent failed to prove his ownership against the said land. The 5th respondent having lost in the said suit, influenced the 3rd respondent-Thasildar to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land. It is further contended by the petitioner that on 16.06.2020, the 3rd respondent’s staff visited the subject land and threatened the petitioner to vacate from the same. As the 3rd respondent along with the 4th respondent tried to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the subject land without issuing 3 any notice or following due process of law, the present writ petition came to be filed. 2. When the matter was listed on 20.03.2025, there was no representation for the 5th respondent. Again the matter was listed on 27.03.2025, none appeared for the 5th respondent. Today also there is no representation for the 5th respondent. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed on record the written instructions dated 21.03.2025, furnished by the 3rd respondent. On perusal of the instructions, it is stated that the land an extent of Ac.3.79 cents in Sy.No.458 and the land an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Sy.No.460- C are classified as Settlement Patta Land. The instructions further read that the respondent Nos.1 to 3 never interfered with the possession of the petitioner nor threatened him to vacate from the subject land. The instructions dated 21.03.2025, furnished by the Tahsildar is placed on record. 4. In view of the above instructions, the present writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the land to an extent of 4 1011.11 sq yards in Sy.No.458 and 460-C of Ward No.18, Guntakal, Ananthapuram District, except in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.01.04.2025 DSB 5 103 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.10394 OF 2020 Date: 01.04.2025 U DSB