MAULANA MOHAMMAD JAFAR @ MAULALA ZAHOOR @ MOHAMMAD JAFAR KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/457/2025 · 2025-05-01
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136775 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136775 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24967 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 457 of 2025 Applicant :- Maulana Mohammad Jafar @ Maulala Zahoor @ Mohammad Jafar Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of opposite party no.1.
2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.2 stand dispensed with.
3. First Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with regard to Case Crime no.2168 of 2008 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 323, 506, 427 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Sultapur.
4. As per contents of F.I.R., the applicant along with co-accused is said to have attacked the informant and his family members while inflicting injuries upon them.
5. Mr. Nikhil SIngh, learned Additional Government Advocate-I has opposed the bail application with submission that charge sheet in the matter has already been submitted in year 2008 but applicant neither cooperated during course of investigation nor even subsequently due to which non-bailable warrant has been issued against him.
6. Learned counsel for applicant however has refuted aforesaid assertions with submission that applicant was unaware with regard to filing of charge sheet until January, 2025.
7. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material on record and particularly in view of fact that non-bailable warrant has been issued against applicant, this Court does not find any good ground to grant indulgence in the matter. Applicant however is granted liberty to seek regular bail.
8. Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench