- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9433-DB WP No. 737 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 737 OF 2023 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. SHANKAR GOWDA K.T. S/O LATE THAMMANNA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS R/AT No.123, CHANDANA LAYOUT 4TH MAIN CROSS SUNKADAKATTE BENGALURU-560 091 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES MINISTRY OF WEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE GOVT. OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110 011 2. THE ADMINISTRATOR SRI. SIDARTH INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTRE T. BEGUR, NELAMANGALA TQ BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 040 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KUMAR M.N., CGC FOR R1; SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. GOULAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9433-DB WP No. 737 of 2023 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (i) ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT No.1 TO TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO IMPLEMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ADMISSION OVERSEEN COMMITTEE, BENGALURU IN CASE No.KEA/AOC/006/2022-23, DATED 19.09.2022 UNDER ANNEXURE-J AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the second respondent that Annexure-J order which the writ petitioner seeks implementation of, had been challenged by the second respondent before this Court and the WP No.24446/2022 had been disposed of by judgment dated 01.02.2025, declining interference with the recommendation of the committee, but making it clear - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9433-DB WP No. 737 of 2023 that any action to be taken against the educational institution will be done after issuance of notice to them as well. 3. In the above view of the matter, this writ petition is also stands disposed of clarifying that in case any further steps are taken by the first respondent, the State or any other authority as against the second respondent, the same will be taken after issuance of notice and after hearing the parties. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21