Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 136743 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/4013/2025 · 2025-04-29

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24322-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4013 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Shri Rakesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. There appears to be some dispute between the petitioner and bhumidhar of adjacent land, proceedings, as informed by the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, under Section 164 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sahinta have been initiated, a fact which has not been disclosed in the writ petition. The petitioner is alleged to have encroached on the bhumidhari land of one Shashidhar who is not even a party here. 3. The petitioner may avail other remedies as may be prescribed in law. 4. We have not adjudicated the assertions by Shri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 29.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench