PRAMILA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/4017/2025 · 2025-04-29
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24334-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4017 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pramila Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Yadav,Virendra Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner alleges some irregularities in issuance of domicile and caste certificate by the Lekhpal/Tehsildar to facilitate appointment as Anganbadi Krayakatri. Some complaint has been submitted, but, the grievance is that inquiry has been handed over to the very Lekhpal who was instrumental in this regard. The complaint of the petitioner submitted on IGRS portal is still pending.
3. The competent authority should look into the matter including the grievance as raised in this petition and do the needful, but, with expedition, if there is no other legal impediment, within six weeks unless it has already been taken in which case the petitioner be informed about the result.
4. We, however, make it clear that we have not adjudicated the allegations contained in the writ petition which can been seen while taking such decision.
5. The writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench