VIPIN KUMAR MISHRA @ VIPIN MISHRA AND 2 OTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN.SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER
A482/4114/2024 · 2025-02-10
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 136714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8530 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4114 of 2024 Applicant :- Vipin Kumar Mishra @ Vipin Mishra And 2 Other Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin.Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Tariq Khan,Km. Anjali Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vinay Prakash Tiwari Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel respondent no. 2.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that vide order dated 04.12.2024, the parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar of this Court regarding verification of the compromise. The petitioners as well as respondent no. 2 on 08.01.2025 appeared before the Senior Registrar of this Court and in their presence, the Senior Registrar of this Court verified the compromise. Report to this effect is on the file of the Court.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that since the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by entering into compromise and the said compromise has been verified under the order of the Court, hence, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to this prayer. Perused the record, so also the report dated 08.01.2025 submitted by the Senior Registrar of this Court. In view of the above and considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of
Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", as well as the fact that the compromise entered between the parties been verified by the Senior Registrar of this Court, the proceedings of Criminal Complaint No. 891/2019, "Ram Manorath Shukla Vs. Vipin Kumar and others", under sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and sections 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Jagdishpur, District Amethi are hereby quashed. The petition is allowed.
Order Date :- 10.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench