RAM KUMAR GUPTA SINCE DECEASED THR LRS v. VIJAY SINGH DAHIYA AND ANR
COCP/266/2025 · 2025-02-03
Harkesh Manuja
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13667 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13667 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.266 of 2025 IN TH 230-U
RAM KUMAR G
Vs VIJAY SINGH D
CORAM: HON'
Present: Mr.
Mr. S
Mr. H
HARKESH MAN
1.
Com Director General, of the respondent same, the petition calculation with r concerned office.
2.
Lear assures that the within three week
3.
In vi counsel for the pe
4.
Dism
5.
How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a
February 03, 202 Atik Whe Whe 025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.
Date of De AR GUPTA SINCE DECEASED T GH DAHIYA AND ANR
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate with Mr. Shubham Jain, Advocate for the Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Harya
**** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Compliance report by way of affi neral, Animal Husbandry and Dairyin ondents has been filed in Court, the etitioner has been accorded the select with respect to the benefits payable t office. Learned State counsel on instructio t the financial benefits shall be rele weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application.
(HA , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable
Yes/N
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.266 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 03.02.2025 SED THR LRS.....Petitioner
....Respondents ESH MANUJA or the petitioner. , Haryana. f affidavit of Dr. Lal Chand Rang airying Department, Haryana on beha t, the same is taken on record. As p selection grade and even the necessar yable to him has been forwarded to th tructions from Sh. Nek Ram, Assista e released in favour of the petition ertaking by the respondent(s), learne present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
1 Ranga, n behalf As per ecessary d to the ssistant etitioner learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.04 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment